Предмет: Английский язык, автор: Tatka2000tatka

Exercise 1. Употребите глагол в нужном времени.

1. I did not see Andrew yesterday. (Past Simple)
2. I … (to know) Jane for three years, but I … (to know) what she is thinking.
3. Do you (to like) playing chess?
4. Can I speak to your parents, please? I’m sorry. They are having lunch at the moment.
5. Our teacher is ill so she … (to be) at school next week.
6. John … (to play) in the school team for two years.
7. My parents … (to work) for this company since 1993.
8. I … (to break, already) two plates. Shall I go on washing up?
9. I … (to sit) here in the park for an hour , and I … (to meet) there friends of mine.
10. The students … (to talk) when the teacher … (to enter) the room.
11. She … (to chop) potatoes when she … (to cut) her finger.
12. Jill … (to sleep) when the telephone … (to wake up) her.
13. Jane … (to wash) all the test-tubes after she … (to complete) the experiment.
14. She … (to do) cleaning by 6 o’clock yesterday.
15. After the stewardesses … (to serve) lunch to the passengers, they … (to calm) down.
16. When she got the results of her medical tests, she realized that she … (to be feeling) ill since she … (to be) on holiday.
17. Kate got married when she … (to be) 27.
18. The restaurant wasn’t expensive. The meal … (to cost) very much.
19. When I … (to arrive) at the office, Jane and Paul … (to work) at their desks.
20. … you … (to be, ever) to France? Yes, many times. When … (to go) the last time? Two years ago.
21. Where … you (to buy) that book? It was a present. Ann … (to give) me.
22. It’s a nice day today. The sun … (to shine).
23. The more you study, the better results … (to be).
24. He looks angry. He … (to argue).

Ответы

Автор ответа: 1979alena
1
1. I did not see Andrew yesterday. 2. I have known Jane for three years, but I don't know what she is thinking. 3. Do you like playing chess? 4. Can I speak to your parents, please? I’m sorry. They are having lunch at the moment. 5. Our teacher is ill so she will be at school next week. 6. John has been playing in the school team for two years. 7. My parents have worked for this company since 1993. 8. I have already broken two plates. Shall I go on washing up? 9. I had been sitting here in the park for an hour , and I met there friends of mine. 10. The students were talking when the teacher entered the room. 11. She was chopping potatoes when she cut her finger. 12. Jill was sleeping when the telephone woke her up. 13. Jane washed all the test-tubes after she had completed the experiment. 14. She was doing cleaning by 6 o’clock yesterday. 15. After the stewardesses had served lunch to the passengers, they calmed down. 16. When she got the results of her medical tests, she realized that she had been feeling ill since she was on holiday. 17. Kate got married when she was 27. 18. The restaurant wasn’t expensive. The meal didn't cost very much. 19. When I arrived at the office, Jane and Paul were working at their desks. 20. Have you ever been to France? Yes, many times. When did you go there last time? Two years ago. 21. Where did you buy that book? It was a present. Ann gave it to me. 22. It’s a nice day today. The sun is shining. 23. The more you study, the better results are. 24. He looks angry. He has been arguing.

1979alena: 14. She had done cleaning by 6 o’clock yesterday.
1979alena: Так же возможен вариант 23. The more you study, the better results will be.
Интересные вопросы
Предмет: Литература, автор: 9a6
За бредовый ответ Репортну!!

Прочтите цитату.
Как вы это понимаете?
Согласны ли вы с идеей автора или нет?
Напишите около 200 слов.

Цитата:

«Адвокат без истории и литературы — это механик, простой рабочий каменщик; если он обладает некоторыми познаниями в этом, он может осмелиться назвать себя архитектором». Вальтер Скотт

Помогите пожалуйста набрать 200 слов. У меня пока получилось ТАКОЕ:

По моему мнению, эта цитата сравнивает способности не опытного человека с двумя высшими образованиями на более понятную для большинства профессию. Таким образом создавая плоскость где заменяется одна профессия за места другой, адвокат выдается за каменщика. Сразу появляется вопрос, правильно ли делать такое грубое сравнение? По моему личном мнению, нет. Ведь зачем сравнивать адвоката с совсем другой отраслью. Ведь таким образом автор груба упрощает все тонкости, нюансы работы адвоката. Мне кажется что такое необычное сравнения делается для того что бы большинство людей общества, которые зачастую не совсем понимают работу адвоката, но легко понимают работу каменщика. Ведь таким образом легче получается грубо судить адвоката, не нагружая себя всеми тонкостями и нюансами этой сложной работы.
Предмет: Литература, автор: cingizhalilov74